History of monetary policy of India

Monetary policy in India

Note that the entirety of the following post has been generated by ChatGPT Deep Research. As such, it might be partially or completely wrong. Yet I’m posting it here because it was useful for me.

I am trying to understand how central bank policy works in India. I want to understand what levers they have, how they are used, what has been the historical trend of these methods and how their impact has tracked.

To provide a detailed analysis of central bank policy in India, could you specify:

• Are you primarily interested in the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) monetary policy, or would you also like insights into fiscal policy interactions?
• Would you like a breakdown of key tools like repo rates, reverse repo rates, CRR, SLR, OMO, etc.?
• Do you need historical trends for a specific time period (e.g., last 10, 20, or 50 years)?
• Are you interested in specific economic indicators tracking the impact (e.g., inflation, GDP growth, exchange rates, stock market)?
• Would you prefer a report format with tables and charts, or a more narrative-style explanation?

I’m looking for RBI monetary policy and would like a breakdown of the key tools as well. A review of the last 20 years is good. A narrative explanation is what I want. Impact on credit growth and credit creation, income growth, and current account balances is something I would like to understand.

Great, I’ll provide a detailed narrative on the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) monetary policy over the last 20 years. This will include a breakdown of key tools such as repo rates, reverse repo rates, CRR, SLR, and Open Market Operations. I will also analyze the impact of these policies on credit growth, credit creation, income growth, and current account balances. I’ll let you know once I have the full analysis ready.

RBI’s Monetary Policy: A 20-Year Narrative (2005–2025)

Introduction

Over the past two decades, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has navigated diverse economic cycles – from rapid growth in the mid-2000s to the global financial crisis, a period of stubborn inflation in the early 2010s, and the recent pandemic shock. RBI’s monetary policy framework has evolved substantially in response. In 2016, India formally adopted a flexible inflation targeting regime, defining price stability as a 4% CPI inflation target (with a ±2% tolerance). This marked a shift from the earlier “multiple indicators” approach, which had guided policy since 1998. Under the new framework, the RBI’s primary objective is price stability, alongside growth support​. The establishment of a Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) in 2016 institutionalized decision-making and enhanced transparency. Throughout this evolution, the RBI has employed a toolkit of monetary instruments – policy interest rates, reserve requirements, open market operations, and others – adjusting them to changing economic conditions. The result has been an ebb and flow of policy stances: from tight money to rein in inflation, to aggressive easing to spur growth or counter crises, and vice versa. This narrative examines how key tools have been used in the last 20 years and how the RBI’s stance shifted in tandem with economic developments, and analyzes the impact of these policies on credit expansion, income (GDP) growth, and the external current account balance.

Key Monetary Policy Instruments of the RBI

RBI influences the economy through several monetary policy tools. Each tool has a distinct role in controlling liquidity, interest rates, and credit in the financial system:

• Repo Rate: The repo (repurchase) rate is the RBI’s main policy interest rate – the rate at which commercial banks borrow funds from the RBI against government securities as collateral​. Changes in the repo rate signal the stance of policy. Lowering the repo makes bank credit cheaper and more abundant, boosting lending and growth; raising it makes credit costlier, cooling demand. For example, when inflation rose persistently, the RBI hiked the repo rate to discourage borrowing and slow money growth; conversely, facing a growth slump (such as after the 2008 crisis or during COVID-19), the RBI slashed the repo rate to stimulate economic activity.
• Reverse Repo Rate: The reverse repo rate is the mirror image of the repo – it is the interest rate at which banks park their excess funds with the RBI, typically overnight. In essence, it’s the rate the RBI pays banks for these deposits​. The reverse repo is used to absorb surplus liquidity from the banking system. An increase in the reverse repo encourages banks to deposit funds with the RBI (earning interest risk-free) rather than lend out, thereby tightening liquidity. A cut in reverse repo has the opposite effect, pushing banks to lend more since parking funds yields less. The repo and reverse repo rates form the upper and lower bounds of the RBI’s liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) corridor, guiding short-term market interest rates.
• Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR): The CRR is a regulatory reserve requirement – the proportion of a bank’s deposits that must be kept as cash with the RBI at all times (on which banks earn no interest). By altering the CRR, the RBI can directly change the amount of funds banks have available to lend. A higher CRR means banks have to set aside more cash with RBI (reducing loanable funds), whereas a lower CRR frees up deposits for lending. For instance, in late 2008 the RBI cut the CRR sharply – from a peak of 9% in August 2008 down to 5% by January 2009 – to inject liquidity during the global financial crisis​. Conversely, during boom times with excess money growth, RBI has raised the CRR (e.g. hiking it to 9% in 2008 to suck out liquidity). The CRR remains a blunt but powerful tool to modulate banking system liquidity​.
• Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR): In addition to cash reserves, banks in India must invest a stipulated percentage of their net deposits in safe and liquid assets, primarily central and state government securities. This ratio is the SLR. It functions as a buffer and a liquidity tool: raising the SLR forces banks to hold more government bonds (constraining their ability to extend credit), while lowering it can free up funds for lending. Over the last 20 years, the SLR has generally been reduced in line with financial liberalization. It was statutorily floored at 25% of deposits until 2007; thereafter, RBI steadily brought it down. From 25% in 2008, SLR was cut to 24% and then 23% by 2012​. Further calibrated cuts in the late 2010s brought SLR to 18% of deposits by 2020​. These reductions were aimed at freeing bank resources for credit growth and aligning with global liquidity coverage standards. The RBI only rarely increases SLR; one instance was an emergency hike from 24% to 25% in late 2009 to constrain credit growth amid inflation concerns​, but since then the trend has been downward.
• Open Market Operations (OMO): OMOs refer to the RBI’s buying or selling of government securities in the open market to regulate liquidity and influence interest rates. When the RBI buys government bonds from banks, it injects rupee liquidity into the system (as payment to the sellers), thereby easing monetary conditions and typically lowering short-term interest rates. Selling bonds has the opposite effect – withdrawing liquidity and tightening conditions. Over the past two decades, RBI has actively used OMOs to manage liquidity swings, especially those driven by capital flows or changes in currency demand. For example, in periods of heavy capital inflows (mid-2000s and again in the late 2010s), the RBI conducted OMO sales (and issued special Market Stabilisation Scheme (MSS) bonds) to absorb the excess rupee liquidity that resulted from its intervention in the forex market. During downturns, it undertook large OMO purchases to inject cash – notably in late 2008, RBI bought government securities to complement CRR cuts and ensure ample liquidity for banks. In recent years, RBI also deployed unconventional OMOs: in 2019 it initiated “Operation Twist” (simultaneous buying of long-term bonds and selling of short-term bonds) to flatten the yield curve and reduce long-term borrowing costs. In 2020–21, as part of the pandemic response, RBI committed to a massive government bond purchase program (G-SAP) to keep yields low amid heavy government borrowing.
• Other Instruments: The RBI’s toolkit includes a few other significant instruments and facilities:
  • The Bank Rate, an older benchmark rate (now largely symbolic) which historically was the standard lending rate of RBI. In modern practice, the bank rate is typically aligned to the Marginal Standing Facility rate and used for calculating penalty rates on certain defaults.
  • The Marginal Standing Facility (MSF), introduced in 2011, is an emergency overnight window for banks to borrow from RBI against government securities above their LAF quota. The MSF rate is set slightly higher than the repo rate (by 25 basis points in normal times). Banks tap MSF when liquidity is very tight. By adjusting the MSF rate, RBI can widen or narrow the interest rate corridor. For instance, during the 2013 currency crisis, RBI temporarily raised the MSF rate steeply (to 10.25%) even as repo was lower, to aggressively tighten overnight rates and defend the rupee – a signal of how MSF can be used as a crisis tool.
  • The Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) is a relatively new addition (2022) that allows RBI to absorb surplus liquidity from banks without the need for collateral (unlike reverse repo which requires government securities). SDF effectively replaced the reverse repo as the floor of the policy corridor in April 2022, giving RBI more flexibility in liquidity absorption operations.
  • RBI also employs macroprudential measures as part of the broad monetary-policy toolkit. These include things like varying risk weights and provisioning requirements for bank loans to certain sectors, or imposing credit growth caps – all intended to curb excessive lending to risky areas without altering overall interest rates. For example, in the mid-2000s, RBI increased risk weights on housing and consumer loans to rein in a potential credit bubble. Such measures often work in tandem with interest rate policy to maintain financial stability.
  • Finally, while not a traditional “instrument,” RBI’s foreign exchange interventions influence monetary conditions. When RBI buys dollars (to prevent rupee appreciation during capital inflows), it releases rupees into the system (increasing liquidity); when it sells dollars (to support the rupee during outflows), it sucks out rupee liquidity. The RBI offsets these effects through tools like OMOs or MSS bonds to ensure that domestic liquidity and interest rate targets remain on track. In episodes like 2013, RBI even introduced special schemes (e.g. a facility for banks to swap foreign currency deposits) to attract dollars and bolster foreign reserves, thereby easing pressure on the external account and the currency. Such measures, while aimed at external stability, had direct monetary impacts and were coordinated with domestic policy tools.

With this arsenal of instruments, the RBI has managed monetary conditions through varied scenarios. Below, we chronologically explore how these tools were deployed and how the policy stance shifted from 2005 to 2025 in response to economic developments.

2005–2008: High Growth and Pre-Crisis Tightening

The mid-2000s were years of robust economic expansion in India. GDP growth regularly exceeded 8%, fueled by booming investment and capital inflows. Bank credit was surging rapidly – in fact, credit growth was excessive by historical standards, with the credit-to-GDP ratio rising well above its long-term trend during 2006–2008​. While this reflected a healthy appetite for investment, it also stoked concerns of overheating. Inflation pressures began to build by 2007–08, partly due to rising global commodity prices and strong domestic demand. The RBI’s monetary policy stance in this period shifted to a “calibrated tightening” bias.

Interest rates were raised preemptively. The repo rate, which had been 6% in early 2005, climbed to 7.75% by late 2006 and further to a peak of 9.0% in July 2008​. Similarly, the reverse repo rose in tandem, maintaining the LAF corridor. By mid-2008, these rates were at their highest levels of the decade, signaling a clear intent to contain inflation and cool credit growth. The RBI Governor at the time, Dr. Y.V. Reddy (followed by Dr. D. Subbarao from September 2008), also employed reserve requirements to tighten monetary conditions. The CRR was raised multiple times – from about 5% in 2005 to as high as 9% by August 2008​ – directly impounding liquidity from banks. In addition, the RBI maintained the SLR at 25% (the statutory minimum then) to ensure banks held substantial government securities rather than lending all deposits out.

These measures were effective in slowing money supply and credit growth by 2007–08. However, they came at a time when global storm clouds were gathering. In 2007, India’s wholesale price inflation was hovering in the 5–7% range – not alarmingly high by later comparisons, but enough to warrant vigilance. The tightening did moderate inflation temporarily and helped build some monetary space. Notably, RBI’s actions in this period also had an eye on the external sector: India was receiving large capital inflows (foreign investment was pouring into emerging markets). RBI intervened to buy foreign currency to prevent a sharp rupee appreciation, and then sterilized the resultant liquidity. One tool for sterilization was the issuance of MSS bonds (beginning mid-2000s) which accumulated a stockpile (peaking at over ₹1 trillion by 2007) – essentially an OMO in reverse, locking up excess liquidity in special government securities. By early 2008, with global oil prices spiking and domestic credit still growing ~25% year-on-year, RBI’s stance remained hawkish. This set the stage for a dramatic turnaround when the global financial crisis hit.

2008–2009: Global Financial Crisis and Aggressive Easing

The collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 triggered a global credit crunch and a sudden reversal of capital flows from emerging markets. India was not immune: by late 2008, export demand plunged, foreign investors pulled money out, and domestic confidence wavered. GDP growth, which had been 9% in 2007–08, decelerated sharply and was heading below 6% in 2008–09. In this environment, the RBI executed a swift and sweeping monetary easing – a 180-degree turn from its previous tightening stance.

Starting in October 2008, the RBI slashed the repo rate in rapid succession. From the peak of 9.0% in July 2008, the repo rate was brought down to 7.5% by early November and further to 5.0% by January 2009​. By April 2009, the repo reached 4.75% (the lowest in decades at that time), and the reverse repo was cut to 3.25%. These aggressive cuts – totaling over 400 basis points – aimed to reduce borrowing costs across the economy and spur banks to lend despite the fearful climate.

Simultaneously, the RBI deployed liquidity tools on an unprecedented scale. The CRR was reduced stepwise from 9% to 5% between October 2008 and January 2009​, injecting massive primary liquidity into the banking system. Each percentage point cut in CRR released tens of thousands of crores of rupees; this was critical as banks were scrambling for funds amid global deleveraging. The statutory SLR was also cut from 25% to 24% in November 2008​ to enable banks to liquidate some government securities and use the money for lending. Moreover, RBI conducted large OMO purchases of government bonds to further ease liquidity. By buying bonds, RBI effectively pumped additional money into banks, ensuring that short-term interest rates fell in line with the policy cuts. It also opened special refinance facilities and expanded limits for export credit refinance to channel liquidity to stressed sectors.

These measures were highly successful in averting a credit freeze in India. By early 2009, liquidity had turned surplus (call money market rates dropped well below the repo rate, reflecting easy conditions). Credit growth, which had dipped in late 2008, revived moderately with support from policy. The government also introduced fiscal stimulus, and together with RBI’s monetary easing, this helped cushion the downturn. India’s GDP growth bottomed out at ~3% in the worst quarter of the global crisis, but then began recovering by mid-2009​

rba.gov.au

. Inflation, which initially dipped due to weak demand, was poised to rebound as liquidity poured back – a challenge that would define the next phase.

In summary, the 2008–09 crisis saw the RBI using all levers in a coordinated easing: plummeting interest rates, large CRR cuts, and expansive OMOs, an approach that injected confidence and liquidity. RBI’s response was noted for being timely and adequate, and India emerged from the crisis with only a mild growth slowdown relative to many advanced economies.

2010–2013: Battling Inflation and Managing Delicate Trade-offs

By 2010, the Indian economy staged a strong comeback. Growth surged to 8.5% in 2010–11, aided by the previous stimulus. However, this rapid recovery brought an unpleasant side effect: inflation roared back with a vengeance. Double-digit inflation became a persistent problem by 2010–2012, driven by a combination of factors – soaring global commodity prices (especially oil and food), lingering effects of the past liquidity glut, and supply-side bottlenecks domestically. Headline WPI inflation stayed around 9–10% for most of 2011, and consumer inflation (CPI) was also elevated. This period presented the RBI with a classic monetary policy dilemma: growth was still robust, but inflation and external imbalances were mounting, threatening macroeconomic stability.

The RBI under Governor D. Subbarao (and later briefly under Governor Raghuram Rajan from Sept 2013) shifted to a markedly tight monetary stance to tame inflation, even at the cost of slower growth. Starting in early 2010, the RBI withdrew the crisis-era accommodation. It raised the repo rate from the low of 4.75% (2009) back into restrictive territory over a series of nearly a dozen rate hikes. By October 2011 the repo rate was 8.5%​, and it was held at or above 8% through 2012. This aggressive tightening cycle was one of the most prolonged India had seen, reflecting RBI’s priority to anchor inflation expectations. Correspondingly, the reverse repo moved up (maintaining the LAF corridor), and short-term market rates rose in tandem.

Reserve requirements were also adjusted: after having slashed CRR to 5% in the crisis, RBI inched CRR back up to 6% by 2010 to pull back some of the excess liquidity​. SLR, on the other hand, remained at 24%–25% in this period; RBI did not raise SLR above 25%, recognizing the need not to unduly constrain banks (and perhaps also because banks anyway held large government bond portfolios). Instead, the brunt of tightening was via interest rates and CRR. The central bank also used moral suasion and macroprudential tweaks – for instance, advising banks to restrain credit to sectors like real estate that were prone to bubbles.

Initially, these moves slowed inflation only marginally. Inflation proved sticky due to structural factors (such as rising rural wages and high fiscal deficits that kept demand buoyant). By late 2011, India was in a stagflation-like environment: growth had started to slow under the weight of high interest rates and global headwinds, yet inflation remained near double digits. The RBI faced criticism for the high interest rates contributing to a sharp fall in GDP growth – from ~9% in 2010 to ~5% by 2012​. Indeed, by 2012-13 India’s growth hit its lowest in a decade (around 5.5%), and investment activity had decelerated markedly. However, Governor Subbarao often emphasized that inflation was inimical to sustainable growth and that the RBI’s priority must be to curb the price spiral.

Another major challenge in this period was the widening current account deficit (CAD) and pressure on the rupee. The booming post-crisis recovery, coupled with high oil and gold imports, pushed India’s CAD to historically high levels – it reached 4.8% of GDP in 2012–13, roughly double the level considered prudent​. This large CAD reflected India’s import demand outpacing export earnings, and it made India vulnerable to shifts in global capital sentiment. The RBI found itself constrained: easing policy to revive growth was risky as it could exacerbate inflation and the CAD, while tightening supported external stability but at the cost of growth. By mid-2013, this trade-off became acute during the “taper tantrum.”

In mid-2013, indications that the U.S. Federal Reserve would taper its quantitative easing program led to a wave of capital outflows from emerging markets. India, with its high CAD and inflation, was among the worst affected – the rupee sharply depreciated (hitting record lows by August 2013), and bond yields spiked. The RBI responded with a set of extraordinary measures focused on stabilizing the currency and financial markets. In July 2013, RBI effectively tightened liquidity by capping banks’ LAF borrowing and raising the MSF rate by 200 bps (to 10.25%). This pushed overnight rates temporarily above 10%, a defensive step to make speculation against the rupee costly. It also initiated OMO sales and forex market interventions to drain rupee liquidity. These moves, although not sustainable long-term, bought time. The government simultaneously took steps to curb imports (notably raising tariffs on gold) to contain the CAD. By September 2013, Dr. Raghuram Rajan took over as Governor and unveiled a broad plan to restore stability – including a special swap window to attract foreign currency deposits (which brought in $30 billion) and measures to deepen forex markets. Gradually, the panic subsided and the rupee stabilized.

Notably, even in the midst of the currency crisis, inflation was still high – CPI inflation was ~9-10% in late 2013. Thus, once immediate stability was restored, Governor Rajan actually resumed a hiking cycle on the repo rate. In September 2013, after a brief pause, the RBI raised the repo from 7.25% to 7.5%, and by January 2014 it stood at 8.0%​. Rajan’s stance was clear: macro stability required bringing inflation down decisively. The RBI explicitly stated that a widening CAD had become a major constraint on easing monetary policy, underscoring that external imbalances and high inflation together left little room for dovishness. By end-2013, however, the stage was set for change: inflation was finally showing signs of receding (helped by a good harvest and softer global commodity prices), and the worst of the currency storm had passed. This laid the groundwork for a shift in framework toward inflation targeting.

In sum, 2010–2013 was a period where the RBI predominantly tightened policy to fight inflation, using higher repo rates and CRR increases, even as growth slowed. It had to juggle multiple objectives – price stability, growth, and external stability – often characterized as maintaining a “delicate balance”​. The challenges of these years convinced policymakers that a clearer nominal anchor (inflation) was needed. By 2014, the preconditions were being set for a new era of monetary policy in India.

2013–2016: From Crisis to a New Framework

In the aftermath of the 2013 turmoil, India saw a concerted effort to stabilize and reform monetary policy. The latter part of 2013 and 2014 became a transition phase, as the economy grappled with lower growth but slowly easing inflation. Under Governor Rajan, the RBI maintained a relatively tight stance initially – holding the repo rate at 8% for most of 2014 – but also clearly articulated a disinflation strategy. Importantly, the RBI, with government support, set in motion the move toward a formal inflation targeting regime.

By late 2013, CPI inflation peaked around 11%. The RBI announced a “glide path” to bring inflation down: 8% by January 2015, 6% by January 2016, and ~5% thereafter​. Remarkably, this glide path was largely achieved. Several factors converged to help: the lagged effect of prior monetary tightening, a collapse in global crude oil prices in 2014 (which sharply reduced India’s inflation and trade deficit), and some fiscal consolidation by the government. As a result, inflation steadily fell – by 2015, CPI inflation was hovering near 5%, the lowest in many years.

With inflation coming under control, the RBI was able to shift to an easing bias to support the still-recovering economy. Starting in early 2015, the RBI began cutting the repo rate. In four moves through 2015, the repo was reduced from 8.0% to 6.75%. By early 2016 it stood at 6.5%​. These cuts were aimed at rejuvenating investment and consumer spending, which had been subdued after the high-interest era. Growth had indeed picked up from the 2012 trough – GDP growth accelerated to ~7.5% in 2014–15 from ~5.5% in 2012–13​ – and easier monetary conditions helped sustain this recovery. The RBI was careful to communicate that further easing would be contingent on continued inflation moderation and fiscal discipline. During this time, the central bank also improved monetary transmission by nudging banks to link lending rates to policy rates more transparently.

A landmark development was the agreement and adoption of a new Monetary Policy Framework. In early 2014, an RBI-appointed Expert Committee (chaired by Dr. Urjit Patel) reviewed the multiple-indicators approach and recommended that inflation should become the primary nominal anchor for policy​. Taking these recommendations forward, the Government of India and RBI signed a Monetary Policy Framework Agreement in February 2015​. This agreement formally committed to inflation targeting. By May 2016, the RBI Act was amended to reflect the new mandate: “the primary objective of monetary policy is to maintain price stability while keeping in mind the objective of growth”. A target was set at 4% CPI inflation with a ±2% band, initially for the period up to March 2021​. To operationalize this, the MPC was established (with three members each from RBI and the government) to set the policy repo rate via majority vote. The first MPC meeting took place in October 2016​.

Thus, by 2016, India moved to a modern inflation-targeting regime, joining many advanced and emerging economies in doing so (albeit with a flexible approach that still considers growth)​. This shift was motivated by the experience of the prior years – the RBI sought a more transparent and credible way to anchor expectations and avoid the growth-inflation see-saw of the early 2010s.

Amidst these structural changes, a significant shock struck in late 2016: the demonetization in November 2016 of ₹500 and ₹1000 banknotes (86% of currency in circulation) led to a temporary liquidity surge in banks (as people deposited old notes) followed by a cash crunch in the economy. The RBI’s policy response to demonetization was unique. In the immediate term, banks were awash with liquidity (over ₹4 trillion of deposits flowed in within weeks), which could have driven overnight rates to zero. To absorb this excess, the RBI initially mandated an incremental CRR of 100% – requiring banks to park all new deposits received in a specified period as reserves​. This extraordinary measure (effective for a fortnight) immobilized about ₹3.5 lakh crore​, preventing a liquidity deluge. Subsequently, as RBI gained permission to issue MSS bonds, it rolled back the CRR and instead used MSS securities and reverse repos to soak up liquidity. In effect, RBI temporarily sterilized the demonetization-driven liquidity to maintain control over interest rates.

Demonetization also caused a short-lived downturn in economic activity (Q4 2016 saw a dip in consumption and SME output). The RBI recognized the deflationary impact, and by October 2016 it had already cut the repo to 6.25%. It held off further cuts in early 2017, partly because demonetization’s effects muddied the inflation outlook (food inflation dropped due to demand shock, but currency scarcity disrupted supply chains). By mid-2017, with normalization underway and inflation hitting historically low levels (~2% due to base effects and food supply improvements), the RBI cut the repo rate to 6.0% (August 2017). This was the lowest repo rate in almost seven years, underscoring the markedly dovish turn from the days of double-digit inflation. Governor Urjit Patel (who took over in 2016) remained cautious, however, highlighting that inflation risks (like crude oil price reversals or fiscal slippage) could re-emerge. Indeed, the easy monetary stance of 2015–2017 needed recalibration as conditions changed in 2018.

In summary, the 2013–2016 phase saw macro stabilization (inflation down from 10% to 5%) and the birth of a new policy regime. The RBI used this window of receding inflation to cut rates and nurture a recovery, even as it fundamentally refocused policy on the inflation target. The demonetization episode tested RBI’s liquidity management adeptness – which it handled through innovative uses of CRR and MSS – without derailing the broader policy path. By 2017, India enjoyed moderate inflation and decent growth, a relatively stable currency, and a credible new monetary framework, although new challenges loomed on the horizon.

2016–2019: The Inflation-Targeting Era and Policy Calibration

With the official adoption of inflation targeting and the functioning of the MPC from late 2016, RBI’s policy decisions became more data-driven and forward-looking. The late 2010s were characterized by generally benign inflation (especially compared to earlier years) and the need to support growth, which was recovering but faced headwinds from financial sector issues. However, this period also saw transient inflationary flare-ups and global uncertainties that required nimble responses. Overall, RBI’s stance oscillated between neutral to accommodative, with a brief tightening interlude in 2018.

In 2017, inflation dipped to very low levels – the CPI averaged ~3.6% for the year, at one point even falling below the 2% lower band. This prompted the RBI to maintain an easing bias. After the August 2017 repo cut to 6.00%, the RBI paused to assess whether the low inflation was durable. By early 2018, signs of rising price pressures emerged (oil prices rose and a fiscal boost via government pay hikes occurred). As a precaution, the RBI shifted to a neutral stance and then a modest tightening. In June 2018, for the first time under the MPC framework, the repo rate was hiked – from 6.00% to 6.25%, followed by another hike to 6.5% in August 2018​. These two 25 bps increases were driven by forecasts that inflation could cross 5% and concerns about capital outflows as U.S. interest rates climbed. Indeed, 2018 saw some rupee depreciation and foreign investor outflows (a mini repeat of taper fears, though far less severe than 2013). Raising rates helped bolster confidence in the RBI’s inflation-fighting credentials. Even with those hikes, monetary policy was far from “tight” in real terms, given that real repo rates hovered around 1-2%, a level consistent with neutrality.

Crucially, by late 2018, the inflation trajectory again surprised to the downside – food prices fell and headline CPI came well under 4%. Economic growth, which had peaked at 8.3% (quarterly) in mid-2018, started slowing, partly because of rising oil prices earlier and the lagged effect of tighter financial conditions. Additionally, India’s banking and financial system was under stress due to the twin balance sheet problem (high Non-Performing Assets in banks and leveraged corporate balance sheets) and a crisis in the non-bank financial sector (IL&FS default in 2018 triggered a credit crunch for NBFCs). These factors led to a significant slowdown in credit flow to the commercial sector by 2019​. GDP growth cooled to ~5–6% by late 2019, the lowest in six years. Sensing these headwinds, the RBI under a new Governor, Shaktikanta Das (who took charge in December 2018 after Urjit Patel’s resignation), pivoted decisively to accommodative policy.

Starting February 2019, the RBI embarked on a rate cutting cycle even before many other central banks (the U.S. Fed, for instance, began cutting later in 2019). Between February and October 2019, the MPC delivered five consecutive repo rate cuts, slashing the rate from 6.5% to 5.15%. This cumulative 135 bps easing was aimed squarely at reviving economic momentum. By early 2020, the repo stood at its lowest level since 2010. The stance was explicitly labeled “accommodative” and the RBI indicated it would remain so as long as necessary to revive growth. Complementing rate cuts, the RBI took liquidity-easing steps: it ensured that the interbank system had surplus liquidity (through OMOs and forex swaps that injected rupees), and it introduced innovative tools like long-term repo operations (LTROs) in late 2019 and early 2020 – providing banks 1-year and 3-year money at the repo rate, to encourage them to lend long-term at lower rates.

This period also highlighted efforts to strengthen monetary transmission. Despite steep rate cuts, there was concern that banks were not passing on the benefits to borrowers quickly (due to high deposit rates and banks’ own financial stress). RBI nudged banks to link new loans to external benchmarks (including the repo) to improve pass-through. It also continually engaged in managing the liquidity situation to keep the money market rates aligned with the repo. By end-2019, the system was considerably liquid, and short-term rates had fallen, but bank credit growth remained anemic due to risk aversion in lending. In fact, bank credit growth fell to about 5-6% in 2019–20, the lowest since 2008–09, reflecting a lackluster appetite to lend amid rising NPAs and NBFC troubles.

On the external front, the late 2010s were relatively stable compared to earlier. The current account deficit averaged around 1.5–2.5% of GDP – significantly lower than the 2012 peak​. Thanks to lower oil prices after 2014 and tempered domestic demand, external imbalances were contained. The RBI steadily built foreign exchange reserves (crossing $400 billion by 2018) as a buffer. This allowed monetary policy to focus more squarely on domestic objectives. By 2019, inflation had slightly picked up (averaging ~4%), but still within target. Thus, RBI was comfortable prioritizing growth. In December 2019, however, inflation spiked temporarily (crossing 7% due to vegetable price shocks), which caused the MPC to pause further rate cuts. Little did the RBI know that an unprecedented global shock was about to hit, which would demand yet another dramatic shift in policy.

2020–2021: Pandemic Shock and Unprecedented Monetary Easing

The outbreak of COVID-19 and the ensuing lockdowns in 2020 delivered the largest economic shock in India’s modern history. GDP contracted by an estimated 6.6% in FY2020-21 (with a steep drop of over 20% year-on-year in the April–June 2020 quarter). Confronted with this crisis, the RBI rolled out an exceptionally accommodative monetary policy – arguably the most expansionary in its history – in order to cushion the economy and ensure financial stability.

In March 2020, shortly after the national lockdown was announced, the RBI convened an emergency MPC meeting. It cut the repo rate by 75 bps (from 5.15% to 4.40%)​, a deeper-than-usual cut reflecting the urgency. A month later, in May 2020, the RBI delivered another 40 bps cut, taking the repo to 4.00% – the lowest policy rate in nearly two decades. The reverse repo was cut even more aggressively, to 3.35%, to push banks to lend rather than park funds (in fact, RBI widened the LAF corridor to 65 bps temporarily, with repo at 4.0%, reverse repo 3.35%, MSF 4.65%)​. By doing so, RBI established a very accommodative interest rate environment. It also explicitly stated that monetary stance would remain accommodative as long as necessary to revive growth. The MPC and Governor Shaktikanta Das emphasized that in such an extraordinary situation, supporting economic activity was paramount, even as they remained vigilant that inflation (initially suppressed by weak demand) could flare up due to supply disruptions.

Beyond rate cuts, the RBI launched a comprehensive array of liquidity and credit measures to transmit the ease through the financial system:

• It conducted large-scale open market purchases of government securities to keep bond yields low and inject liquidity. In 2020, RBI’s balance sheet expanded massively as it bought G-secs; it later formalized a quantitative easing-like program in 2021 (G-SAP) committing to further purchases.
• It introduced Targeted Long-Term Repo Operations (TLTROs) – providing banks with 3-year money at the repo rate, on the condition that these funds be invested in corporate bonds, commercial paper, and debentures of specific sectors (like NBFCs, housing finance, MSMEs). This was meant to channel liquidity to stressed corners of the credit markets and ensure even private borrowers benefited, not just the government. Over ₹1 trillion of liquidity was offered via TLTROs in tranches​.
• The RBI cut CRR by 100 bps – from 4% to 3% – effective March 28, 2020​. This one-time reduction was aimed at freeing up bank funds (about ₹1.37 trillion)​. Notably, this was the first CRR cut since 2013 and brought CRR to its lowest ever level of 3%. The cut was to be effective for one year (until March 2021) to help banks support credit flow during the pandemic. Additionally, RBI temporarily reduced the minimum daily CRR balance requirement (allowing banks to not meet 100% of CRR every day) to give further flexibility​.
• It expanded the MSF borrowing limit for banks, allowing them to dip further into SLR holdings to borrow (MSF limit raised from 2% to 3% of NDTL)​. This enabled banks to avail extra liquidity (up to ₹1.5 trillion) if needed, basically to tide over any cash crunch.
• To alleviate borrower distress, RBI allowed loan moratoriums – banks were permitted to grant a six-month pause on loan repayments for all term loans. This regulatory forbearance was crucial to prevent a cascade of defaults and give breathing space to individuals and businesses hit by the lockdowns. Subsequent restructuring schemes were also rolled out for viable but stressed accounts.
• The RBI engaged in forward guidance and assurance to markets. Governor Das in April 2020 famously said “whatever it takes” in the Indian context, signaling that RBI would use all instruments to ensure financial conditions remain easy. It continuously communicated its commitment to keep borrowing costs low – for example, it capped yields in government bond auctions and even cancelled auctions to send a signal that it did not want yields to rise when government borrowing needs were high.

Collectively, these actions kept the financial system stable through an unprecedented contraction. Interest rates across the spectrum fell: corporate bond yields and bank lending rates hit multi-year lows. Banks were flush with liquidity; at one point, surplus liquidity exceeded ₹6 trillion. The credit transmission improved, aided by the glut of funds and regulatory pressure. However, actual credit growth to the real economy remained modest for a while – partly because banks, although liquid, were cautious to lend in the face of uncertainty, and demand for loans was weak during the lockdown. Still, RBI’s measures undoubtedly prevented a financial crisis and set the stage for recovery. By late 2020, as the first wave subsided, India’s economy started rebounding, and the RBI slowed the pace of new stimulus but reiterated it would continue supporting growth.

Inflation during 2020 was tricky: supply disruptions caused food inflation to spike, and CPI inflation even stayed above the 6% upper tolerance for several months. The RBI had to essentially look through these supply-side inflation pressures, prioritizing growth. In fact, the MPC missed the inflation target for a few quarters but was forgiven under the circumstances. By early 2021, inflation dipped back within range, and the focus remained on consolidating the recovery. The second COVID wave in April-May 2021 prompted RBI to extend support measures (like another round of loan restructuring and liquidity lines to emergency healthcare loans), but by then no further repo cuts were done as the rate was already very low at 4%.

The net effect by 2021–22 was that India saw an extraordinary swing: from -5.8% GDP contraction in 2020 to a +9.7% jump in 2021 (partly base effect)​. The RBI’s ultra-loose policy undeniably contributed to this comeback by enabling both government fiscal push (through low borrowing costs) and easier credit. Broad money growth was strong, yet financial stability was preserved – unlike some past episodes, India did not face a currency crisis or runaway inflation after this stimulus, thanks in part to a comfortable external surplus in 2020 (the current account briefly moved into surplus as imports collapsed). By mid-2021, the RBI began gingerly preparing for policy normalization, but emphasized it would be guided by the evolution of inflation and growth and that the process would be gradual.

2022–2025: Withdrawal of Accommodation and Policy Normalization

As the pandemic’s acute phase waned and the economy returned closer to normalcy, the RBI – like many central banks – faced the challenge of unwinding its extreme accommodation without derailing the recovery. Moreover, new shocks emerged: in 2022, global inflation surged (exacerbated by the Russia-Ukraine war driving commodity prices higher) and domestic price pressures reappeared, forcing the RBI to tighten policy again. The years 2022–2025 thus saw a policy pivot back toward rate hikes, followed by a period of careful calibration to balance growth and inflation in a more normal economic environment.

In early 2022, India’s CPI inflation started breaching the 6% upper tolerance, driven by rising food and fuel prices. The output gap was also closing as GDP reached pre-pandemic levels. The RBI initially maintained that some inflation drivers were transitory, but by April 2022 it became clear that a response was needed. In an unscheduled announcement in May 2022, the RBI raised the repo rate by 40 bps to 4.40%, kicking off a new tightening cycle. Subsequent MPC meetings saw further hikes: the repo was raised to 4.90% in June, 5.40% in August, and 5.90% by end-September 2022. By February 2023, after another couple of hikes, the repo rate reached 6.50%, effectively undoing the pandemic-era cuts (back to the level last seen in early 2019). The cumulative hikes of 250 bps were aimed at re-anchoring inflation expectations and stabilizing the rupee (which faced depreciation pressure as the U.S. Federal Reserve hiked aggressively). The MPC’s stance shifted to “withdrawal of accommodation,” indicating that while policy was tightening, it was moving from an overly easy setting toward neutral.

On the liquidity front, the RBI started absorbing excess liquidity that had been built up. The large surplus from 2020 was gradually reduced via reverse repos, cessation of bond purchases, and allowing fiscal balances to drain some liquidity. In April 2022, the introduction of the Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) at 3.75% (25 bps below repo then) as the floor for absorption gave RBI a new tool to mop up liquidity without collateral. This replaced active use of the reverse repo in the tightening phase. By late 2022, the system liquidity had normalized to near-neutral (sometimes mild deficit) from a massive surplus a year before. The CRR, which had been cut to 3%, was fully restored to 4% by May 2022​, reversing the emergency pandemic cut. The RBI managed this liquidity normalization smoothly to avoid sudden credit market tightening.

Despite the fairly steep rate hikes, the Indian economy proved resilient in 2022–23. Growth moderated from the rebound pace but remained robust (around 7% in FY2022-23). Bank credit growth, interestingly, accelerated significantly post-pandemic – reaching double-digit rates (above 15% year-on-year) by 2022. This was in part due to pent-up demand for loans and a turning of the credit cycle; banks, having cleaned up some of their NPAs, were more willing to lend. Even with higher interest rates, business and consumer credit demand held up, suggesting that the level of rates (6%–7% repo) was not overly restrictive relative to nominal growth.

By early 2023, inflation began easing back toward the 5–6% range, thanks to monetary tightening and a correction in some global commodity prices. In April 2023, the MPC surprised markets by pausing further rate hikes at 6.50%, citing the need to assess the cumulative impact of past hikes on the economy. This marked a shift to a more cautious approach – acknowledging that policy was now in mildly positive real rate territory and that additional moves would depend on the evolving inflation-growth mix. Through the rest of 2023, RBI kept the repo rate unchanged at 6.50%, even as major central banks like the Fed continued some hikes. India’s inflation saw spikes (e.g., due to vegetables in mid-2023) but these were managed via supply-side measures, and core inflation trended down.

Entering 2024, with global monetary tightening peaking and India’s inflation back near 5%, the RBI gradually moved to a neutral stance. By now, the focus started to tilt back to supporting growth, as higher rates and global uncertainties (slowing external demand) posed growth risks. Indeed, after two years of no cuts, the RBI finally cut the repo rate to 6.25% in February 2025 by 25 bps, marking the first easing move since the pandemic​. This cut was a calibrated step to nudge growth, as domestic demand was softening and inflation was firmly within the target band. Even at 6.25%, the repo rate in 2025 remained well above the pandemic low, indicating that policy had normalized to a new equilibrium. The RBI’s communication in this phase emphasized a readiness to act in either direction – ensuring inflation stays around 4% while not stifling the economic expansion.

Throughout 2022–2025, the current account deficit fluctuated: it widened in 2022 as imports surged with the recovery (peaking around 3% of GDP), but then narrowed as commodity prices cooled and exports picked up in 2023–24. RBI’s monetary tightening indirectly helped contain the CAD by tempering domestic demand (especially for imports) and by bolstering investor confidence in the rupee. Importantly, RBI’s hefty foreign reserve stockpile (around $600 billion in 2022) allowed it to buffer the currency without derailing domestic liquidity. The external situation remained far more comfortable than in 2013; as Governor Das noted, the “external fragilities” were much lower​. This gave RBI the space to tighten at its own pace without sparking a panic, and likewise to pause without fear of destabilizing outflows. By 2025, India’s macroeconomic situation was one of moderate growth (~6%), moderate inflation (~4-5%), and a manageable CAD (~2% of GDP) – a testament to the balancing act the RBI performed through the turbulent years.

Impact of Monetary Policy on Credit Growth and Credit Creation

Monetary policy has had a profound impact on credit growth in India over the last 20 years, often visible with a lag. In broad terms, when policy was accommodative – low rates, abundant liquidity – credit expansion tended to accelerate, and conversely, tight policy contributed to credit slowdowns. However, the relationship has not been mechanical; it was mediated by banks’ balance sheet health and borrower demand, especially in the later years.

During the mid-2000s, easy financial conditions and a booming economy led to an explosion in bank credit. Year-on-year bank credit growth routinely exceeded 20-25% between 2004 and 2007, even crossing 30% at the peak. This credit boom coincided with RBI’s relatively neutral policy stance early on, though by 2007 RBI was tightening (hiking rates and CRR) to rein it in. As noted, India’s credit-to-GDP gap turned strongly positive from 2006 to 2012, indicating credit growth well above trend. This period saw aggressive lending to infrastructure, real estate, and retail segments. The RBI did employ macroprudential measures (like higher risk weights on certain loans) to try to cool specific sectors, but overall credit creation was primarily private-sector driven in response to growth prospects. The impact of RBI’s late-2000s tightening was a gradual moderation of credit growth by 2008, but the global crisis then intervened.

Post-2008, RBI’s stimulus – drastic rate cuts and liquidity infusion – clearly helped reignite credit growth after an initial dip. In 2009 and 2010, bank lending picked up again as businesses drew on easier credit to finance recovery. Credit growth, which had fallen to ~15% in 2009, rose back above 20% in 2010-11 in response to low interest rates and ample liquidity. However, as RBI pivoted to tightening from 2010 onward, credit growth started decelerating. High interest rates (repo at 8%+) and repeated CRR hikes dampened loan demand and banks became cautious. By 2012–2013, with repo around 8% and real rates turning positive, credit growth fell to around 10%. The most significant factor was that persistent tightening to quell inflation made borrowing expensive and slowed investment demand. Sectors like infrastructure that had borrowed heavily in the boom began to struggle, leading to rising NPAs which further crimped banks’ ability and willingness to lend.

The credit cycle downturn became severe by the mid-2010s. After the 2013 crisis, even as RBI eased rates in 2015, banks were saddled with bad loans (the legacy of the 2000s boom). Despite repo cuts from 8% to 6.5% in 2015-16, credit growth remained subdued in the ~8-10% range, far below earlier levels. This was an example of impaired monetary transmission: RBI was pumping liquidity (for instance, through OMOs in 2015 when it bought dollars to prevent rupee appreciation, thus injecting rupees), but banks used much of it to shore up balance sheets rather than aggressively lend. The government’s push to recognize and resolve NPAs around 2015-2017 (Asset Quality Review, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code introduction) meant banks were more risk-averse. As a result, by 2017 credit growth hit multi-decade lows – around 5% year-on-year, the weakest since 1993. One analysis noted that bank credit growth fell to about 4.2% in 2019-20, the lowest since 2008-09 (partly reflecting the NBFC crisis too). This slump in credit creation significantly dragged on the economic growth in the late 2010s. The RBI responded by easing policy aggressively (as discussed, 135 bps of cuts in 2019) and by taking steps to directly boost specific lending (like liquidity for NBFCs, or priority sector lending tweaks). But the credit engine was firing only on a few cylinders – retail loans (home, personal loans) kept growing fairly well, helped by lower lending rates, whereas corporate credit stagnated.

A turning point came post-2020. The RBI’s massive liquidity injection and ultra-low rates during the pandemic initially prevented a credit collapse – banks continued to lend to safer segments and under government credit guarantee schemes (for MSMEs). Then, as the economy recovered in 2021-22, credit growth accelerated sharply, even outpacing the economic recovery. By 2022, bank credit was expanding above 15% annually​, marking a new credit up-cycle. Several factors aligned: the earlier deleveraging meant large firms had room to borrow again; banks, having provisioned for bad loans and with improved capital, were eager to lend; and RBI’s accommodative stance (even as it started raising rates, financial conditions remained supportive with plentiful liquidity in early 2022) acted as a tailwind. The Economic Survey 2024-25 observed that India is witnessing the “commencement of a new credit up-cycle”, after the prolonged deleveraging phase​. By Q1 2024, even with RBI’s policy rate back to 6.5%, credit growth remained in double digits, suggesting that underlying credit demand was robust and that banks were more confident. The RBI’s gradual approach to normalization ensured that this credit revival was not choked off. Moreover, RBI’s regulatory steps (like allowing banks to use excess provisions, reducing liquidity coverage ratios temporarily​) facilitated banks’ ability to lend during the recovery.

In summary, RBI’s monetary policy influenced credit creation in a countercyclical fashion: loose policy helped spur credit in downturns, while tight policy (often necessitated by inflation) reined in credit booms. However, the impact was also heavily shaped by the health of the banking system. In the early 2010s, despite tightening, credit still grew fast until NPAs hit; in late 2010s, despite easing, credit growth lagged until balance sheets healed. By the mid-2020s, with banks largely healthier and inflation under check, RBI’s balanced stance has supported a sustainable credit expansion. Notably, at the time of writing, India’s credit-to-GDP ratio remains moderate (around 57% as of 2023), leaving room for credit growth to continue without immediate macro risk​, as echoed by the RBI which judged the recent double-digit credit growth as sustainable given the still-low credit penetration​.

Impact on Income (GDP) Growth

RBI’s monetary policy has a critical influence on income growth, i.e. the growth of GDP and overall economic activity, though the relationship is mediated by lags and other factors. Over 20 years, India’s growth has ebbed and flowed partly in line with the monetary stance: generally, expansionary monetary policy has supported higher growth, while contractionary policy to fight inflation has often coincided with slower growth. That said, external shocks and fiscal policy also played significant roles in growth outcomes.

In the mid-2000s, relatively neutral-to-easy monetary conditions facilitated India’s high-growth phase. With inflation moderate and policy rates not restrictive, investment flourished and GDP grew ~9% annually during 2005-2007. When RBI began tightening in 2007-08, it did so into the momentum of an already strong economy, so growth remained high until the global shock hit. The global financial crisis in 2008 caused growth to dip sharply (from 9.3% in 2007-08 to 6.7% in 2008-09), but RBI’s swift easing helped arrest the fall. The economy bounced back to 8.5% growth in 2009-10 and 10.3% in 2010-11 (in quarter 1 of 2010, GDP briefly grew near double digits)​. Analysts noted that this rebound was fueled by the joint fiscal-monetary stimulus​ – RBI’s low interest rates and abundant liquidity in 2009-10 encouraged consumption and investment to resume quickly​. However, this rapid growth “rebound” came at the cost of reigniting inflation, indicating that perhaps monetary policy stayed loose a bit too long.

Consequently, the early 2010s saw growth falter as RBI tightened policy to combat inflation. The lagged effects of tighter monetary policy (repo 8%+, CRR 6%, etc.) from 2010 manifested in 2012-2013, when investment projects slowed or stalled due to higher financing costs and reduced credit availability. GDP growth downshifted to 5.5% in 2012-13 – often dubbed the “growth slowdown” or “mini crisis” of that time​. In effect, India had gone from near-double-digit growth to almost half that pace in the span of three years, in part because high inflation necessitated a restrictive monetary stance that dampened domestic demand. The RBI itself acknowledged this difficult trade-off, as maintaining high growth was untenable amid surging prices and a weak external position​. Thus, while the RBI’s priority was price stability, the side effect was a notable slowdown in income growth. Investment-to-GDP fell and industrial output stagnated in those years, reflecting the policy-induced demand compression. It’s worth noting that other factors (policy bottlenecks, global commodity shocks) also contributed, but monetary tightening was a key piece.

From 2014 onward, as inflation came under control, monetary easing helped growth recover. Once the RBI started cutting rates in 2015, along with lower oil prices, India’s GDP growth accelerated. It reached 8.2% in 2015-16 (using the revised GDP series) – making India one of the fastest-growing major economies. Accommodative policy played a supportive role by lowering the cost of capital and stimulating consumption (e.g., car and home loans became cheaper). For instance, the housing market saw a revival partly because interest rates on home loans dropped in 2015-16 following repo cuts. That said, the investment pickup remained modest relative to the mid-2000s boom, as banks and corporates were still cautious. Growth in this period was largely consumption-led, which is more immediately sensitive to interest rate changes.

The demonetization in 2016 and the introduction of GST in 2017 caused some volatility in growth. Demonetization in Q4 2016 caused a sharp but short-lived slump in cash-dependent sectors; GDP growth dipped in that quarter but then normalized by early 2017. The RBI’s role here was mainly to ensure liquidity; it did cut rates in August 2017 which provided a mild stimulus afterward. Overall, 2016-2017 growth moderated to around 6-7%, partly due to these structural changes, but low inflation and RBI’s neutral stance prevented a deeper slowdown.

In 2018-2019, growth again slowed (to ~5-6%) as the credit issues mounted and as RBI had to hike rates a bit in 2018. The slight tightening in 2018 (50 bps of repo hikes) likely had some marginal dampening effect on interest-sensitive sectors like durables and construction in 2019. However, the bigger drag then was the credit crunch from the NBFC crisis, which monetary policy alone couldn’t fix immediately. By late 2019, RBI’s aggressive rate cuts were an attempt to re-energize growth, but just as those cuts were percolating through, the pandemic hit.

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 caused an unprecedented contraction – a supply-side shock that monetary policy could not prevent but could only mitigate. RBI’s rapid rate cuts and liquidity infusion in 2020 (along with fiscal measures) likely softened the blow and enabled the strong recovery thereafter. While GDP still contracted by around 6.6% in FY21, it’s conceivable the decline could have been deeper without the RBI’s support that prevented a financial collapse. By 2021-22, India’s GDP rebounded by over 9%​, regaining lost ground. RBI’s continued low-rate stance through 2021 was crucial in enabling this rebound – it allowed the government to borrow cheaply and spend, and it bolstered interest-sensitive consumption (e.g., a boom in home sales in 2021-22 was partly attributed to the lowest mortgage rates in decades).

Moving into 2022-2023, as RBI tightened policy to tackle inflation, one might expect growth to suffer. Indeed, some softening occurred – from 8.7% in FY22 to ~7% in FY23, and forecasts around 6% for FY24. But growth remained relatively resilient despite 250 bps of hikes, indicating perhaps that the hikes mainly removed extraordinary stimulus rather than actively restraining demand. Additionally, robust credit growth and government capex acted as counterweights. The RBI’s calibrated approach avoided a hard landing. In effect, by not overstimulating for too long and then not over-tightening abruptly, RBI helped steer the economy to a more sustainable growth path.

In a long-term sense, one can argue that RBI’s emphasis on price stability ultimately supports better growth outcomes. The high inflation period (2010-13) yielded poor growth, whereas the low inflation period (2016-19) had better, if not spectacular, growth. Studies have shown that India’s potential growth is maximized when inflation is moderate. Governor Shaktikanta Das remarked that anchoring inflation around 4% creates conditions for sustainable growth​ – a hypothesis borne out by the relatively stable growth in the late 2010s. Conversely, when inflation and the current account were out of control in 2013, growth suffered severely.

In conclusion, RBI’s monetary policy has had a counter-cyclical influence on economic growth: supporting growth during downturns (2009, 2013-14, 2020) and reining it during overheating phases (2007-08, 2010-11, 2022). While not the sole determinant of India’s growth, the RBI’s actions often set the broad contours within which the economy operates. The last 20 years have underscored that maintaining macroeconomic stability (through prudent monetary policy) is a precondition for sustained income growth – the painful lessons of the high inflation period led to reforms that have arguably put India on a more stable growth-inflation mix since 2016.

Impact on Current Account and External Balance

Monetary policy also interacts with external balances, particularly the current account (which measures the trade balance plus net income/transfers). While the current account is influenced by a host of factors (oil prices, global demand, exchange rate, fiscal deficit, etc.), RBI’s policy has indirect but important effects on it via exchange rate movements, domestic demand (which drives imports), and investor sentiment (which affects capital flows used to finance the current account). Over two decades, one sees that periods of very loose monetary policy and rapid growth in India often coincided with widening current account deficits (CADs), whereas tight monetary stances and slowdowns helped narrow the CAD (though sometimes at the cost of growth). The RBI has at times explicitly considered the CAD in its policy deliberations, especially when large deficits threatened external stability.

In the mid-2000s, India’s CAD was relatively modest (around 1-2% of GDP) despite high growth, partly because export growth was also strong globally and oil prices, though rising, hadn’t hit their peak yet. The RBI’s intervention in forex markets to stem rupee appreciation contributed to rising reserves, and the excess liquidity was managed via MSS bonds. As such, monetary policy was not constrained by external factors then – RBI could tighten or ease mostly based on domestic inflation without worrying about balance of payments. The rupee’s exchange rate was allowed to gradually appreciate till 2007, which helped keep import costs (and thus CAD) in check even as the economy expanded.

The situation changed in the early 2010s. India’s CAD started deteriorating sharply around 2011-2013, coinciding with the domestic overheating. Easy money and credit in prior years had boosted domestic consumption and investment, much of which spilled into higher imports (from capital goods to gold and oil). High oil prices and a surge in gold imports (gold being seen as a hedge in a high-inflation environment) led to the CAD hitting an all-time high of 4.8% of GDP in FY2012-13​. This was well above the RBI’s comfort level (the RBI had often informally cited 2.5% of GDP as a sustainable CAD). The ballooning CAD was a red flag – the RBI noted it had become a “major constraint” on monetary policy easing, even though growth was weak, because easing could aggravate capital outflows or currency weakness​. In effect, the RBI was cornered into maintaining a tighter policy than growth alone would justify, due to external vulnerabilities. The taper tantrum crisis of 2013 dramatically illustrated the link: global investors, alarmed by India’s high CAD and inflation, withdrew funds, causing the rupee to plunge. The RBI’s subsequent actions (emergency liquidity tightening, rate hikes, special deposit schemes) were essentially geared towards restoring confidence in the external account – by making domestic assets more attractive (via higher interest rates) and by directly shoring up FX reserves​. These measures, along with government steps (like curbing gold imports, which shrank the trade deficit), helped pull the CAD down to about 1.7% by 2013-14 and stabilized the rupee.

Thus, monetary tightening in 2013 was in part done to contain the CAD and defend the rupee, even though domestic demand was already weak. This highlights that RBI’s mandate, while primarily inflation, does include financial and external stability considerations. The episode taught policymakers the importance of keeping the CAD at sustainable levels; it also showed that a credible anti-inflation stance can help reduce the CAD by tempering import-heavy consumption and improving the confidence of foreign investors.

From 2014 to 2019, India’s current account fortunes improved. The CAD narrowed substantially (even touching ~0.6% of GDP in FY2016). A big driver was the collapse of global oil prices in 2014-15, which cut India’s oil import bill. But also, monetary policy discipline contributed: by bringing inflation down and not overstimulating demand, RBI indirectly kept import growth in check. Additionally, a positive real interest rate differential attracted steady capital inflows (FDI and portfolio), allowing reserves to build without much pressure on the rupee. By 2018, RBI officials noted that external fragilities like the size of the CAD had abated. Indeed, even though oil prices rose in 2017-18, the CAD stayed around 1.5-2%. RBI’s exchange rate policy during this time was to let the rupee be largely market-determined with mild intervention – the rupee even appreciated in 2017 when inflows were heavy, which helped counter imported inflation. A stronger rupee made imports cheaper and exports a bit costlier, naturally limiting the CAD. In 2018, as oil spiked and CAD crept up above 2%, the RBI’s rate hikes not only addressed inflation but also helped keep the rupee competitive enough to avoid a runaway CAD. When the NBFC crisis and global trade tensions slowed growth in 2019, imports slowed too, keeping the CAD manageable.

During the 2020 pandemic, a striking development occurred: India’s current account actually moved into a surplus for a few quarters (the first time in over a decade). This was not due to monetary policy per se, but because imports collapsed more than exports during lockdowns. RBI’s ultra-easy policy in 2020 did not translate into a CAD widening because domestic demand was suppressed by the pandemic’s direct effects. In fact, the massive liquidity and low rates, combined with weak credit demand, led to capital outflows (Indians investing abroad) and a surplus current account – a unique situation where despite printing money, external balance improved because nobody was spending it on imports. The RBI seized this opportunity to acquire reserves aggressively – India’s reserves swelled by over $100 billion in 2020-21. This reserve buildup was effectively sterilized via corresponding liquidity measures to avoid inflation (RBI’s foreign asset purchases were a form of injection, but offset by reverse repos/MSS etc., in line with keeping monetary conditions easy but not chaotic).

As the economy normalized in 2021-22, the CAD went back into deficit, exacerbated by rising global commodity prices. By late 2022, CAD was again around 3-3.5% in a couple of quarters – high, but unlike 2013, India had huge reserves and much lower inflation differential, making investors less skittish. Still, RBI’s tightening cycle in 2022 had the side benefit of cooling domestic demand and thus moderating imports, helping to rein in the CAD. A significant impact of RBI’s 2022 rate hikes was on the exchange rate: by maintaining a differential with U.S. rates and by intervening (RBI sold some reserves when needed), it prevented excessive rupee depreciation. A too-weak rupee could have further inflated the import bill. The rupee did depreciate ~10% in 2022 against the USD, but this was milder compared to some peers, and it actually helped exports remain competitive, partly offsetting the import bill increase.

By 2023-24, the CAD had fallen back to about 1-2% of GDP as oil prices eased and import growth slowed (also thanks to the lagged effect of higher interest rates). The RBI, having rebuilt reserves after 2022 (reserves rose back near $600B by late 2023), is in a strong position to manage any external shocks. Importantly, the era of high inflation and high CAD of early 2010s seems to have given way to a more moderate regime where the RBI’s vigilance on inflation also contributes to external stability. Lower inflation means the rupee’s real exchange rate stays competitive (so exports can do well) and it means less erosion of purchasing power – potentially reducing the gold imports that Indians resorted to as inflation hedge before.

In direct terms, monetary policy affects the current account through the investment-savings balance: loose policy can reduce savings (by lowering interest earnings) and boost investment (by cheap credit), often expanding the CAD if it overshoots domestic saving. That happened pre-2013. Conversely, tight policy can increase savings (rewarding savers) and curtail investment, shrinking the CAD – which happened 2013 onwards. The RBI’s task is to modulate this without swinging to extremes. The adoption of inflation targeting has arguably kept expectations anchored and avoided the kind of runaway inflation that would sink the currency and blow out the CAD.

In summary, RBI’s monetary policy over two decades has been intertwined with the external sector health. Periods of prudent policy and contained inflation saw manageable current account deficits, which, combined with capital inflows, led to rising forex reserves and a stable rupee. On the other hand, loss of monetary control (high inflation) was accompanied by unsustainable CADs, prompting corrective action. The worst external scare of this period – 2013 – was mitigated by a decisive monetary and regulatory response, after which RBI has been ever cognizant of the “twin deficits” problem (fiscal and current account). Today, India’s current account is in a far better position relative to the mid-2000s for a given growth rate, partly because structural reforms and sensible monetary management have reduced the import intensity of growth (e.g., controlled inflation means lower gold imports; domestic production initiatives reduce import reliance). Through its influence on the exchange rate and domestic demand, RBI’s policy stance will continue to shape the trajectory of the current account, aiming to ensure that external deficits remain within sustainable financing limits and do not destabilize the economy.

Conclusion

Twenty years of India’s monetary policy tell a story of learning and adaptation. The RBI has moved from a multiple-indicator, somewhat discretionary approach to a rule-based, inflation-targeting framework that still retains flexibility for India’s unique context. The central bank’s toolkit – repo and reverse repo rates, CRR/SLR, OMOs, and various new facilities – has been actively used to navigate the economy through cycles of boom and bust, domestic shocks like demonetization, and global shocks like the 2008 crisis and the 2020 pandemic. Major trends emerge from this narrative: a general decline in trend inflation (from ~9-10% early in the period to ~4-5% now)​, a moderation of interest rate volatility (though still significant at times), and a financial system that, while tested, has largely been safeguarded by timely RBI interventions.

The RBI’s policy stance evolved from relatively tight in the early 2000s (under pressures of high pre-2008 credit growth) to ultra-loose in 2009 (crisis fighting), then tight again in early 2010s (inflation fighting), then gradually easing mid-2010s (supporting recovery and new framework), to ultra-loose in 2020 (pandemic support), and back to tightening in 2022 (inflation control), and now easing slightly in 2025 as inflation stabilizes. This reflects a responsive central bank that has tried to strike the right balance in changing conditions.

Economically, these policies have had concrete consequences. Credit growth mirrored the policy cycles – robust in accommodative phases and faltering when policy was tight or banks were stressed. Income (GDP) growth too saw boosts from accommodative policy and slowdowns when policy was tightened to restore stability. The current account balance, while not an explicit target of monetary policy, improved whenever inflation and domestic demand were reined in, and worsened when expansionary policies (or external price shocks) led to excessive demand for imports.

One of the clearest lessons is that maintaining macroeconomic stability (low inflation, sustainable external deficits) is essential for long-run growth – and the RBI’s role in this is pivotal. By 2025, India enjoys far lower inflation than it did a decade prior, and its growth, credit expansion, and external deficit are on a more sustainable path​. This is not to say challenges won’t arise; the RBI will continue to face the task of supporting India’s high growth potential (which still demands ample credit and investment) while keeping an eye on inflation and financial stability.

The narrative of 2005–2025 shows an RBI increasingly willing to deploy innovative tools (from MSS bonds and forex swaps to LTROs and Operation Twist) and to communicate its strategy clearly. Such clarity and flexibility have enhanced policy effectiveness. For example, when the RBI explicitly shifted to inflation targeting, inflation expectations dropped and actual inflation fell below 4% on average after 2016​, giving India room to cut rates and spur growth without running into balance of payments problems.

In conclusion, the last twenty years of RBI’s monetary policy underscore a journey toward maturation – using the standard levers of repo, CRR, SLR, OMOs more deftly, and supplementing them with new instruments in extraordinary times. The evolution of policy stance – from tightening in boom, easing in bust, to institutionalizing price stability – has overall benefitted the Indian economy by smoothing out extremes. As evidenced by the trajectory of credit, income, and external indicators, the RBI’s actions have helped steer India through tumultuous global events and domestic changes. Looking ahead, with the experience of two decades and a robust framework, the RBI is better equipped than ever to handle the next set of challenges, ensuring that monetary policy continues to foster an environment conducive to sustainable growth and financial stability in India.

Sources:

• RBI and MPC policy statements, and RBI publications (2005–2025).
• Reuters news archives for policy rate, CRR, SLR changes and economic context​ 1​ 2​ 3​ 4.
• Shaktikanta Das, “Seven Ages of India’s Monetary Policy” (RBI/BIS, 2020)​ 1 2​ 3.
• Pami Dua (2020), Monetary Policy Framework in India – Indian Economic Review​ 1​ 2.
• RBA Bulletin (2018 & 2021) analyses on Indian economy and banking ​1​ 2.
• Economic Survey of India 2024-25, on credit cycle and macro trends ​1 ​2.
• Academic and IMF studies on India’s monetary transmission and CAD determinants​1 ​2.
• News articles and press releases on RBI measures (e.g., 2020 COVID measures ​1 ​2, 2016 demonetization liquidity steps ​1).